| Verified No Logs VPNs | |
| #1 | ExpressVPN with [49% Discount] |
| #2 | NordVPN with [68% Discount] |
| #3 | VyprVPN |
| #4 | Perfect Privacy |
| #5 | OVPN |
This guide examines all “no logs” VPN services that have actually been verified and proven true.
What is the best no logs VPN service and which of them are trustworthy and proven?
This is a tough question. First, there are dozens of VPNs claiming to be “no logs” without any proof or verification whatsoever. In other words, you just have to take their word at face value. But herein lies the problem.
VPNs have been caught lying about their “no logs” claims!
Over the past five years, I have identified a few dishonest “no logs” VPNs that have collected user data and provided the information to government agencies. Here are three examples:
- PureVPN claimed to be “zero logs” but was caught logging customer data for the FBI.
- IPVanish also claimed to be “no logs” but then collected logs and provided the data to the FBI.
- HideMyAss provided logs to US authorities for a hacking case.
There are surely other cases of this happening that have not come to light. We only know about the cases above from court documents that were released to the public detailing how the VPNs gave up logs.
We recommend no-logs VPNs that have been verified
Fortunately, there have been a handful of VPN services that have had their no-logs claims tested and verified to be true. We will examine these VPN providers below and exactly how their logging policies have been verified.
Here are the best no logs VPN services:
1. ExpressVPN: Third-party audit & real-world verification
| VPN | ExpressVPN |
| Based in | British Virgin Islands |
| Logs | No logs (audited) |
| Price | $6.67/mo. |
| Support | 24/7 Live chat |
| Refund | 30 days |
| Website | ExpressVPN.com |
ExpressVPN is based in the British Virgin Islands and it’s currently the top recommendation in our comparison of the best VPNs. It offers user-friendly VPN apps with excellent performance, strong security, and great features. If you want to use your VPN for streaming, ExpressVPN has you covered. It is one of the few VPNs that work with Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, and many other streaming services.
In terms of speeds and security, ExpressVPN leads the pack. I can routinely get around 150 Mbps on nearby servers (with a 160 Mbps connection). It encrypts all traffic with an AES-256 cipher and an RSA-4096 key with Perfect Forward Secrecy. Check out the ExpressVPN review for a detailed analysis and all test results.
Now let’s examine how ExpressVPN’s no-logs policies have been tested and verified.
ExpressVPN implements TrustedServer (RAM-disk servers)
Last year ExpressVPN upgraded its entire server network to run in RAM-disk mode. They refer to this as the TrustedServer feature. This update ensures nothing can be stored on any VPN server as it does away with traditional hard drives. As they explained, this is a major improvement from a privacy and security standpoint:
With our industry-first TrustedServer technology, our VPN servers run only on volatile memory (RAM), not on hard drives. Since RAM requires power to store data, this guarantees that all information on a server is wiped every time it is powered off and on again.
In contrast, the traditional and most common way of running servers relies very much on hard drives, which retain all data until they are erased and written over, a painstaking and error-prone process. This increases the risk that servers could inadvertently contain sensitive user information. If someone were to hack or seize the server, they could gain access to this data. Even worse, hackers who do find their way in might be able to install a backdoor that remains indefinitely.
Read more about the TrustedServer feature here.
Surfshark also runs all servers in RAM-disk mode, which seems to be the safest and most secure setup.
Third-party audits
ExpressVPN has also passed a third-party audit that was conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers. This security audit verified the TrustedServer feature, no logs policy, and that all privacy protections are being adhered to correctly. Very few VPNs have undergone third-party audits to verify logging policies.
Lastly, ExpressVPN also decided to open source their browser extensions and subject them to a full security audit by Cure53. Cure53 is a well-regarded cybersecurity firm based in Berlin that has also audited other VPNs, such as TunnelBear.
Turkish authorities try to collect logs, then seize ExpressVPN server (but still no data)
In addition to audits, ExpressVPN has also passed a real-world test.
In December 2017, Turkish news outlets reported that police in Turkey attempted to force ExpressVPN to provide customer data for a criminal investigation. However, ExpressVPN did not have any logs to provide authorities, as they explained in a statement.
After failing in their attempts to coerce data from ExpressVPN, the Turkish police then decided to physically seize ExpressVPN’s server, which they obtained from a data center in Turkey. However, this also did not reveal any information because ExpressVPN does not keep any logs on its servers – or otherwise.
ExpressVPN further clarified that all customer data was safe when they issued a statement on the case:
As we stated to Turkish authorities in January 2017, ExpressVPN does not and has never possessed any customer connection logs that would enable us to know which customer was using the specific IPs cited by the investigators. Furthermore, we were unable to see which customers accessed Gmail or Facebook during the time in question, as we do not keep activity logs. We believe that the investigators’ seizure and inspection of the VPN server in question confirmed these points.
Conclusion: As you can see above, ExpressVPN has gone above and beyond most VPN services in terms of securing customer data and validating their own servers, policies, and applications. Here’s a brief overview:
- ExpressVPN’s network and all VPN servers operate in RAM-disk, thereby making it impossible to store logs on any VPN server.
- An outside auditing firm (PWC) confirmed that ExpressVPN remains true to its no-logs policies. Additionally, ExpressVPN passed an independent security audit conducted by Cure53.
- ExpressVPN passed a real-world test when authorities in Turkey first demanded customer logs, then seized an ExpressVPN server. But they still failed to obtain any logs or user data.
If you want to give ExpressVPN a test drive, grab the coupon below for three months free.
ExpressVPN Coupon
Sign up for the 12 month plan, and get 3 months FREE (49% Off)
Get Three Months Free + 49% Off ExpressVPN >>
(Discount is applied automatically.)
See our ExpressVPN review for more info and test results.
2. NordVPN: Passed third-party audit, upgraded security
| VPN | NordVPN |
| Based in | Panama |
| Logs | No logs (audited) |
| Price | $3.71/mo. |
| Support | 24/7 Live chat |
| Refund | 30 days |
| Website | NordVPN.com |
NordVPN is a no logs VPN service based in Panama. It offers a wide selection of apps, excellent speeds, and more privacy and security features than most other VPNs. In the latest round of testing for the NordVPN review, it performed well in all categories. It now fully supports the WireGuard VPN protocol in all NordVPN apps, offering users faster speeds and upgraded security. I recently hit 445 Mbps with NordVPN in testing out WireGuard vs OpenVPN speeds.
NordVPN uses the strongest encryption standards and also includes built-in leak protection (kill switch) with all VPN apps. Additionally, NordVPN also offers these privacy and security features:
- Double-VPN servers to encrypt traffic over two different locations
- Tor-over-VPN servers that also encrypt traffic through the Tor network
- P2P servers for high-speed downloading and file sharing (NordVPN is ranked as the best VPN for torrenting)
- Obfuscated servers to hide VPN traffic to look like regular HTTPS encryption and also get around VPN blocks
- CyberSec feature to block ads, trackers, and malware domains
NordVPN is easily one of the best VPNs you will find in terms of privacy features and performance.
NordVPN audited by PWC to verify no logs claims
Similar to ExpressVPN, NordVPN has also completed a full audit to verify the no-logs policy. The audit was PWC AG and the auditors confirmed that NordVPN was fully compliant with its no logging policies.
I carefully examined the auditor’s findings for this guide and can offer this overview:
- NordVPN was audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers. PWC had full access to examine NordVPN’s servers, interview employees, observer operations, inspect configurations, databases, and any other relevant aspect of the VPN service.
- The audit officially verified NordVPN to be a “no-log service” that is compliant with their privacy policy and no-logs claims.
- NordVPN does not store connection logs, IP addresses, traffic logs, or any internet activity information.
The audit confirmed NordVPN’s logging policy, which you can read on their website as follows:
NordVPN strictly keeps no logs of your activity online. That means we do not track the time or duration of any online session, and neither do we keep logs of IP addresses or servers used, websites visited or files downloaded. In other words, none of your private and secure data is logged and gathered at any time. As a result, we are not able to provide any details about your behavior online, even if you request it yourself.
NordVPN is based away from the EU and US jurisdiction and is not required to collect your personal data and information– it means nothing is recorded, monitored, stored, logged or passed to third parties.
In addition to the no-logs policies, NordVPN has also implemented big security upgrades and new features.
Additional NordVPN security upgrades and features
Perhaps one of the biggest security upgrades in years, NordVPN now offers full support for the WireGuard VPN protocol. This protocol uses the latest encryption standards and also outperforms all other VPN protocol (based on my own testing). NordVPN’s implementation of the WireGuard VPN protocol is called NordLynx. It uses a double NAT system to ensure the highest privacy standards and it worked very well in my tests.
Other security upgrades with NordVPN:
- All servers in the network are upgraded to run only in RAM-disk mode
- Ongoing security audit and penetration testing conducted by Versprite
- Public bug bounty program
Conclusion: NordVPN’s no logs policies, favorable jurisdiction, strong security, and excellent performance make it a great choice for all types of users. It works well with all streaming services and also offers many privacy features. With the coupon below, NordVPN is one of the best values available for a no logs VPN.
NordVPN Official 68% Off Coupon
Get 68% off NordVPN (drops the price down to $3.71 per month)
68% Off NordVPN here >>
(Discount is applied automatically.)
Check out the NordVPN review for more info.
3. VyprVPN: No logs verified with third-party audit
| VPN | VyprVPN |
| Based in | Switzerland |
| Logs | No logs (audited) |
| Price | $2.50/mo. |
| Support | Chat and email |
| Refund | 30 days |
| Website | VyprVPN.com |
VyprVPN is a no logs VPN service based in Switzerland with secure apps and good performance. It did well in speed tests for the VyprVPN review and has a pretty good reputation. VyprVPN is unique in that they physically own every server in their network (no rentals from third parties), which helps to ensure data security.
If you want a VPN to get around blocks, then VyprVPN is a great choice. It offers the Chameleon protocol, which will get around most VPN blocks and restrictions. This is important when using a VPN for China.
No logs: VyprVPN audited / advised by cybersecurity firm
To verify the no logs policies, VyprVPN underwent an independent audit conducted by Leviathan Security Group. The auditors examined all aspects of VyprVPN’s network to identify areas where logs were maintained that could de-anonymize the user. After fixing a few issues, they re-tested everything and found VyprVPN to be in full compliance with their stated “no logs” policy.
VyprVPN’s security audit is available to the public here and can be referenced publicly. Here are a few sections:
We examined all components of the project according to the threat assessment described below. While vigilance against logging is necessary to complete the process of implementing “No Log”, we feel that this assessment achieved its goal of uncovering weaknesses in Golden Frog’s implementation. The project revealed a limited number of issues that Golden Frog quickly fixed. As a result, it can provide VyprVPN users with the assurance that the company is not logging their VPN activity.
Golden Frog worked to remediate all no-log-related findings concurrently with the assessment. Once it had completed this, we performed a retest and verified that all of the fixes were effective.
Before this change took place, VyprVPN logged connection data (including IP addresses) for 30 days. Now, VyprVPN can be counted among the small number of verified no logs VPN services.
https://VyprVPN.com
See the VyprVPN review for more information and test results.
4. Perfect Privacy: Real-world verification of no logs
| VPN | Perfect Privacy |
| Based in | Switzerland |
| Logs | No logs |
| Price | $8.95/mo. |
| Support | Email & forum |
| Refund | 7 days |
| Website | Perfect-Privacy.com |
Perfect Privacy is a Switzerland-based VPN that offers advanced online anonymity and security features. It is a no logs service that does not restrict user accounts in any way, giving you an unlimited number of connections. Privacy features include multi-hop VPN configurations, port forwarding, and a TrackStop feature to block ads, trackers, malware, and phishing domains.
From the beginning, Perfect Privacy has focused their service on privacy and anonymity, never keeping logs of any kind and not limiting VPN connections in any way.
The two main drawbacks with Perfect Privacy is the high price and the lack of support for streaming services. While Perfect Privacy is not the best VPN for streaming, it does well in the areas of privacy and security.
Perfect Privacy server seized in the Netherlands
Even though Perfect Privacy has not undergone a third-party audit, like our other top recommendations, it has passed a real-world test. A few years ago, Perfect Privacy announced that Dutch authorities had seized one of their servers in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Although the reason for seizing the server was never revealed, Perfect Privacy confirmed no customer data was obtained:
Since we are not logging any data there is currently no reason to believe that any user data was compromised.
…We can now conclude that no customer information was compromised due to the seizure. The Rotterdam location will continue to operate using the replacement servers.
RAM-disk servers (no logs possible)
Just like with ExpressVPN and NordVPN, Perfect Privacy runs all their servers in RAM-disk mode. They explain the reasoning for this on their log policy page:
Our infrastructure is built on this philosophy: All our services are running within strongly encrypted RAM disks so that it is technically impossible for data to be stored on hard drives. This also means that no data can be recovered if the power is disconnected.
Nobody can force us to log your data. If that were the case we would rather discontinue Perfect Privacy than to record your data and compromise your privacy.
While Perfect Privacy does have some drawbacks, it remains a great option for privacy-focused users.
https://www.perfect-privacy.com/
Our Perfect Privacy review has more info and test results.
5. OVPN – A no-logs VPN in Sweden
| VPN | OVPN |
| Based in | Sweden |
| Logs | No logs |
| Price | $4.99/mo. |
| Support | Email and chat |
| Refund | 10 days |
| Website | OVPN.com |
OVPN is a smaller VPN provider in Sweden that takes privacy very seriously. When it comes to logs, they have been a zero-logs VPN service from the very beginning. In fact, they even have insurance to cover legal fees for court costs to fight any data requests. They also publish regular transparency reports documenting anything that could affect customer data and privacy.
Similar to NordVPN and Surfshark, OVPN offers double-hop VPN servers and also an ad-blocking feature. The desktop apps for Linux, Windows, and Mac OS all incorporate leak protection and strong encryption. And like NordVPN, OVPN supports WireGuard for even better speeds compared to other protocols.
OVPN wins court case proving no-logs claims
In September 2020, OVPN won a court battle proving that it does not keep any logs. The case centered around a movie company that was demanding user data and logs for a public IPv4 address, presumably for a copyright violation issue.
OVPN won the case by successfully proving that they do not have any logs to provide:
To summarize the verdict, the Rights Alliance and their security experts have not been able prove any weaknesses in OVPN’s systems that could mean that logs are stored. OVPN therefore wins the information injunction as our statements and evidence regarding our no log VPN policy have not been disproven. The movie companies also need to pay OVPN’s legal fees.
It’s also worth noting that OVPN uses only dedicated bare-metal servers running in RAM-disk mode. This further ensures there is no user data available for anyone to go after.
https://www.ovpn.com/
See the OVPN review for more info.
Other verified no logs VPN services
Since first writing this guide, there have been a few other VPNs that have undergone audits to verify their privacy and security claims.
1. IVPN: No logs VPN based in Gibraltar (audited)
First up is IVPN, a VPN provider based in Gibraltar. IVPN used Cure53 for the audit, which verified the privacy claims as follows: “Based on the findings, it is safe to say that all of the IVPN’s privacy statements could be verified as truthful within the defined scope.”
2. Private Internet Access: Two court cases proving no logs (but beware of new ownership)
Private Internet Access is a United States-based VPN that offers a low-cost, simple, and user-friendly VPN service. While it remains a decent cheap VPN service, it does have some noteworthy drawbacks. Here were a few issues that I discussed in the PIA review.
- PIA sold out to Kape Technologies in November 2019. Kape is a company with a history of producing malware and adware. There are also some strange ties between Kape leadership and foreign surveillance agencies.
- PIA is based in the United States, a Five Eyes surveillance country.
- When it comes to Netflix and other streaming services, PIA is usually blocked.
PIA’s no logs claims have been tested and proven in two separate court cases:
- In a 2016 court case, PIA was subpoenaed by the FBI for logs, but PIA testified in court that it had no logs to hand over. This is explained in official court documents.
- Once again, in 2018, another court case put PIA’s no-logs policy to the test. As explained in this news article, Private Internet Access officially testified that it did not have any logs it could hand over to authorities.
Unfortunately, even with these court cases, there’s no way to know if PIA is collecting logs today. In the United States, any business can be forced to collect user data for government, and there are examples of this happening with VPNs and private email services. (We’ll examine this more below.)
3. PureVPN: No-logs audit (after providing logs to authorities)
In an attempt to regain trust among the VPN community after the logging case a few years ago, PureVPN has undergone an audit of its own.
The auditing firm that PureVPN used was Altius IT based in California, which conducted the audit remotely (no on-site investigations). The audit concluded in June 2019 and verified that PureVPN now aligns with its no-logs policies. Whether or not PureVPN can be trusted, after already providing logs to authorities, is a question you must answer.
Jurisdiction and logging policies with VPN services
One thing to consider with any VPN service is jurisdiction: where the VPN is legally based.
Jurisdiction is an important factor to consider because it greatly affects the security of the VPN’s customers. A VPN must abide by the laws in the country in which it is legally based (incorporated). Many countries have laws that can undermine encryption and data security, for example:
Australia and access to encrypted data
Australia has a law that allows governments to force companies to provide access to encrypted data. We discuss this topic at length in our guide on VPNs for Australia. Here’s a brief synopsis of this law:
The Australian Parliament passed a contentious encryption bill on Thursday to require technology companies to provide law enforcement and security agencies with access to encrypted communications.
Privacy advocates, technology companies and other businesses had strongly opposed the bill, but Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government said it was needed to thwart criminals and terrorists who use encrypted messaging programs to communicate.
Right now, the United States is considering similar legislation, which you can read about here.
United States can force companies to hand over logs
The US is also a hostile jurisdiction for privacy. Here, authorities can force companies to hand over data logs and provide access to user information. Here are three examples:
- Lavabit was forced to provide encryption keys to its email service. Rather than comply, the owner shut down the company.
- Riseup, a secure email and VPN service in Seattle, was forced to hand over user data to the FBI and also slapped with a gag order that prevented any disclosure.
- IPVanish, a “zero logs” VPN, provided user logs to the FBI for a criminal investigation.
Choose your VPN carefully and also consider jurisdiction. We recommend going with a VPN service in a safe privacy jurisdiction, such as Panama, the British Virgin Islands, Switzerland, and others.
Conclusion on VPNs with no logs
With high-profile logging cases eroding user trust, such as with PureVPN and IPVanish, it is now more important than ever to verify that a VPN’s claims are actually true.
To be sure, maintaining some connection logs is not necessarily a deal-breaker, especially if it is done in an honest and transparent manner, such as with VPN.ac. The problem, however, is that many VPNs simply use “no logs” as a marketing slogan, without any kind of verification.
Another issue is that there’s no widely accepted definition of exactly what “no logs” means.
In light of all these factors, it’s great to see that there are VPNs taking proactive steps to verify and audit their own policies. This helps to build trust and maintain a higher level of honesty in the industry.
While there will always be bad apples in the VPN world, there are still a small number of trustworthy VPNs that have properly earned the title of “no logs” services.
The table below includes the best no logs VPN services that have been proven and verified:
$6.67
(49% discount)
(30 day refund)
Review
(ExpressVPN)
$3.71
(68% discount)
(30 day refund)
Review
(NordVPN)
$2.50
(30 day refund)
Review
(VyprVPN)
$8.95
(7 day refund)
Review
(Perfect Privacy)
$4.99
(10 day refund)
Review
(OVPN)
Last updated on September 18, 2020.
No logs proven in real world-
1. Perfect-Privacy
2.ExpressVPN
3. Private Internet Access
4. OVPN
5. ….
your ipvanish review is out dated, the company was bought out so you are essentially reviewing the wrong company
Yes, IPVanish has been bought out twice now over the past few years. First, it was purchased by Stackpath a few years ago, and then acquired by J2 Global. But nonetheless, IPVanish is still the same VPN service, with the same performance, and same apps and policies, but just a different owner. So I have to disagree with the whole “reviewing the wrong company” thing.
So, did riseup vpn hand over the logs or data? Is it safe to use now. In2020.
[https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/07/19/flash-vpn-ufo-vpn-and-five-other-services-leaked-1-2tb-of-private-information/]
Write it down on free vpn review pls.ty
Hi Sven,
Glad I found this amazing website. Anyways I just wanted to know about integrating vpn’s. If I wanted to use windscribe as the exit vpn, since it offers free 10Gb, which is more than enough for me, Just curious that since its under five eyes Jurs., consider for example, I am connecting to Hong Kong server, and I am being traced for P2P sharing, and my isp is not a part of five, nine and 14 eyes(also brief me if it is a part of em) , how would they pinpoint me if I am also using a express or nord vpn as my entry vpn.
There are different ways to use two or more VPNs at the same time. We discuss this in the multi-hop VPN article.
Hey Sven, Why can’t you add surfsharj to your list ?
Surfshark is a great VPN that performed well in the Surfshark review, but it has not undergone a no-logs audit or other verification like these VPNs.
Dear Sven,
what about AlgoVPN?
https://github.com/trailofbits/algo
Hi Sven.
I’m from Venezuela the dictatorship regimen censorship and punch the adverse opinions.
I fight regimen using Twitter, I browse Twitter using Tor, can you recommend me a free VPN service for Android to mask my IPS before I run Tor
What’s your opinion of ProtonVPN?
Thanks for your attention
Saludos
The ProtonVPN review may be helpful. They offer a free version, but it is slow and they restrict the servers and features.
Hey Sven,
Just a quick question.
1) When a VPN provider says they dont keep logs, how do they know that the data centers that they rent the servers from dont store logs or monitor traffic?
2) Take ExpressVPN for example, they say they dont have to accept subpoenas from other countries to put a back door into their servers but would their servers be under the juristiction of the country they are hosted in? So for example an the US could force the company hosting EXpressVPNs servers to put a back door in?
Hi Jacob,
1. There’s no way to be certain what the data centers are logging, if anything, but that’s not as concerning as you may think because:
– The VPN provider has full control over the VPN server, including encryption keys. So the server remains encrypted and under the VPN’s control, even while physically located in a data center.
– ExpressVPN runs all servers in RAM-disk mode, which means if the server was ever tampered with or removed from the stack (power cut) all data would be wiped immediately (no hard drives).
– Hundreds of others VPN users are also connecting to that server at the same time. This means even if the data center was logging the incoming IPs and outgoing IPs on that server, the only thing they could try to do is try to correlate traffic to identify people, which is extremely difficult, especially with ExpressVPN using shared IPs and lots of users on that server (lots of noise).
If you still find this theoretical scenario concerning, there’s always the option to run two or more VPNs at the same time, as discussed in the best VPNs article toward the bottom of the guide.
Hi all the VPNs on this list would have a kill-switch, I’m answering to
@ Milo https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/no-logs/#comment-28206
Quote: “The caveat here is this method doesn’t include a VPN “kill switch” for which you’ll need a third party application like VPN Lifeguard.”
Never tried your mentioned kill-switch and when I first looked only a few (3) I’d found, one of which offered a paid Pro version.
VPNCheck Pro – I’ve used for quite awhile now not so much for it’s kill-switch functions but, for the gray/white noise I can create from my system using it.
See: Why is Computer ID protection important?
http://www.guavi.com/vpncheck_pro_computer_id.html
Some other features as well, (dated interface), but I like that I (admin acc) can control the changing of my Hostname, Computer name and MAC address at random w/some restart usually req.
Every restart of the PC the computer name (ID) can be set to change in an auto setting offered, and it’s the only ID auto-change feature setting offered.
You have to elect the Hostname and MAC address change manually from the UI while running – just click it’s icon from an admin acc.
Cool to never giving off the same digital exhaust or trail with these changes possible.
Here’s a few more KS I’ve not tried-
https://sourceforge.net/projects/vpnautoconnect/
https://alternativeto.net/software/vpn-lifeguard/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/vpnautoconnect/
@ Amber https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/no-logs/#comment-28145
Quote: “I have tried many VPNs now and I have had very poor performance with all of them.
At first, I thought it was entirely the VPN provider, but even after trying the expensive ones, I have no success.
I then tried running speed tests with my iPhone. The speeds doubled, still not great when my non VPN speeds are over 180 Mbps.”
Hey, if your non-VPN speeds are over 180 Mbps that’s a premium ISP’s speeds tier your on and that your paying a premium price for I’d say.
Maybe your thoughts of VPN speed should be given to the ISP of choice being used – have you kept the same ISP provider throughout your many tried VPN services ?
I’ll throw out a few thoughts I have (from reading) and an old memory as a non-Techy dude.
Your ISP could be throttling your VPN traffic – how ? Maybe deep packet inspections / server routes taken or other way developed.
See Sven’s comment https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/test-check-vpn-working/#comment-47407
About: commercial (data center) IP addresses and residential IP addresses.
It’s possible ISPs could have by now developed a throttling list (similar to malicious / Ad servers lists), of the VPN server data centers IP address their customers use.
Possible as well of your Win OS rig could be leaking certain things about the device itself, apps/extensions or traces of your networks meta-data activity.
Secure your Computer ID’s protection from those finding out your Hostname, Computer name or MAC address, as by anyone on the web or a local network, yes even your first service signup/activation on ISPs too.
I suppose you could hunt down some deep OS/registry setting/changes, but you’d need to change then frequently (like at system start-ups) or even with a button to use while online.
Not techy enough myself to run down these parts in the OS/Reg settings, I had searched and chosen a tool that offer much to such features.
I’m not to sell you short – (do read up), as the Auto-create Computer ID on startup feature is the only apps computers ID protection setting that happens at startups regularly if set. It as well in the Hostname and MAC address are changeably anytime within the apps UI under admin accounts.
Though, something will needed to be restarted to effect the change taking place. It just works for me in my situation.
Works on Win – Linux – OSX https://youtu.be/XZpD1lwtico?t=65
http://www.guavi.com/vpncheck_pro_computer_id.html
Have you tried running some website tests to see of anything that your device is giving off – identifiable to it or you ?
https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/test-check-vpn-working/
https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/test-check-vpn-working/#comment-21751 , https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/test-check-vpn-working/#comment-5262
QT: “I’ve done the usual, disabled my Windows and third party firewall and malware application. I have tried different VPN protocols with no improvement.”
If you’ve the time try a fresh installing of your OS anew offline and before you’ll install anything else to the system /drive or in updates, set it up as you do with your system settings. Free of any add-on to anything else being installed for right now.
Now install a trusted third-party system drive backup or clone software and make a few backups or clones of your system drive to different storage places.
Install your current VPN client and service now, and see what your speed is like with a bare as possible new installation of the OS on your device.
Best part is your Systems drive is now cloned or backed up and is ready to get you here to the same place – but faster should there be a repeat needed.
Prior to your fresh anew of the OS install, do hunt down the trusted cloning/backup software you’ll use and the vetted M$ updates you’ll need.
This will be your next progressive clone or system drive backup made.
You won’t want them all of the M$ update patches, I happen to go with the Group B list here from the very helpful site https://www.askwoody.com/ms-defcon-system/
Win7/8.1 users fall into one of two camps: Those who trust Microsoft’s updates and those that only want it’s security patches. Let’s call them Group A and Group B, respectively: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3128983/how-to-prepare-for-the-windows-781-patchocalypse.html
Win7 and 8.1 Group A and Group B patches
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/2000003-ongoing-list-of-group-b-monthly-updates-for-win7-and-8-1/
How to update Windows 10 — safely
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/2000005-how-to-update-windows-10-safely/
Resource to help you locate the AKB article
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/knowledge-base-listing/
Hope this helps anyone at any time.
VyprVPN STILL has the BF/CB Sale active by your linking to it here.
2 Years @ $2.50 mo / $60.00 billed every 2 years = 81% OFF {last page
I was with an ISP that delivered internet over cellular (data) towers via a hotspot being USB wired straight to my PC for internet.
I’m now with a cable ISP in a similar break for low-incomes and seemingly a little faster speeds from the cable sourced internet.
I pay a flat rate w/taxes & fee’s, around $15.mo now for it’s advertised speeds of this eligibility offered programs tier at 15 down and 2 up speeds.
I already had a cable modem that works for this ISP and have picked up another router capable of DD-WRT firmware flashing.
Had 3yrs now a TP-Link router (NEW) that DD-WRT doesn’t support and so the reason of buying another one.
Pays to do a little home/leg work especially understanding (components-softwares) as where you want to end up in it overall.
– Help’s by giving a particular purpose to a brand up for assignment, then researching it with a full outline in the other parts/units as you’d understood to cover of your game plans path.
Trouble I made for self, was I wanted a router in my setup and I shopped for ‘one’s’ I could afford, as merit to my $$ choice-style, not the practical applications side of would it serve in beneficial purpose and harmony to my privacy and security protections plan.
“Everything behind a VPN router flashed with DD-WRT.” My goal…
VPN over my Router to PC running an installed VPN Client and service.
Not some hosh-cosh ménaging things together as I tend to do, being doomed to fail without further reinforcements in understanding the principles to be applied before a start.
I have never ran a router setup before, so just making sure this unit works for being a ‘new’ one.
It’s Administrators account offers a VPN Client & linking to .ovpn files, one at a time, to use of it’s VPN function, and I’m trying it out for sure.
Till I get the Linksys WRT32X flashed over with it’s version in DD-WRT firmware, I’m going to run Both my VPN Clients to function as this way for now. Is that bad Sven ?
Even thought my unencrypted speeds are slow but much faster than I’m used too. Encrypting to a closer vpn server helps maintain my base speed.
I downloaded the Vyprvpn (ovpn) files package (160-256 encryption schemes) and linked to a Vyprvpn server by connecting the Router up to it’s service – works okay for what it is. No Kill-Swith here as the DD-WRT has I hear in routers UI.
The ISP cable’s speed alone, seems 3+ x’s as fast as the cell data (LTE/4G) internet’s best speed I’d gotten from it’s source.
Though we’re looking at wired compared to wireless carrying the data load and others pulling in that wireless mobiles cell signal in the area I live.
Speed Tests:
I can’t remember my old speeds I’d checked long ago from the mobile ISP data internet my PC got over the sprint hotspot.
Windows own handling of downloads registered at best speed around 150 kilobytes and mostly in the range of 20-50 kilobytes generally at peak times.
@@I’m trying to let people know even with only an advertised 15-Mb speed and use of the VyprVPN service – it works better than I had experienced in years with any internet traffics speed.
The Linksys router’s online administrators account has a speed-test checker built in and quite handy that I’ll run and post the results here.
My base speed from the cable ISP is below – (all VPN traffic off here)
– Download 18-MBits/s, Upload 3-MBits/s, Ping-7ms – [Ping can go higher ms at times on same ISP server]
– Download 16.89-MBits/s, Upload 2.35-MBits/s, Ping-61ms / different test, browser with Speedtest.net New York, NY server.
VPN ON:
1st test, only the VyprVPN client installed to my win OS, I connected to it’s server less than 600 miles (20 ms) away from my cable’s ISP location.
– Download 18-MBits/s, Upload 3-MBits/s, Ping-11ms
After a 30 min wait I tried again with the same VyprVPN server (it’s client read 62ms for that 600 mile distance) this time round.
– Download 17-MBits/s, Upload 2-MBits/s, Ping-38ms
2nd test, I’ll used the Linksys router’s admin. VPN Client with my VyprVPN credentials /and it’s own Vyprvpn client in my OS has been STOPPED.
– Download 17-MBits/s, Upload 2-MBits/s, Ping-20ms // USA – (19ms) Chicago.ovpn 256
– Download 17-MBits/s, Upload 2-MBits/s, Ping-39ms // USA – (44ms) New York.ovpn 256
– Download 14.52-MBits, Upload 2.16-MBits, Ping 45-ms // Speedtest.net/Chicago, IL server.
3rd test, with the Linksys router’s admin. VPN Client & with the VyprVPN client both are RUNNING & Connected to different (2) servers Vypr offers.
Traffic route > (64ms) Chicago.ovpn 256 / Router VPN Client > (40ms) New York server 256 / VyprVPN Client
– Download 17-MBits/s, Upload 3-MBits/s, Ping 49ms
– Download 11.66-MBits, Upload 2.02-MBits, Ping 77-ms – Speedtest.net // New York, NY server.
Every time I’ve changed to / from a VPN client running or stopped I’ve restarted the router to reset my connection.
Sometimes the Vypr client when disconnected & stopped required the PC being restated to restore the internet connection. (it’s kill-switch Not used in tests).
All results are from the Admin UI speedtest of the Linksys router – unless the results line has Speedtest.net in it.
No Real Change in the results – unless I double teamed the VPN clients, I’m getting better up and down speeds than was advertised, even when using VyprVPN or any VPN for the matter.
Thought, if I’m not double hopping per se’ as Sven’s explained it – from behind one VPN client chaining a few cascading servers together.
Not sure what it’d be called, but as it’s posted of my speed results , where they did diminished a little with the use of both VPN clients running in encrypting my network traffic.
How’s that work breaking it down ?
Sven, would that be a form of double encryption then ?
ISP > Modem > Linksys router (encrypts) > PC (encrypts) > ISP > Internet
I’ve some questions Sven, being I’m on two separate VPN Clients – can I connect each to a same VyprVPN server ? Any consequences ?
I’d like going with the fastest server in my local, that’s listed in it’s clients UI and with changing the ovpn file in the routers VPN client to this same that’s used on my PC clients side ? Is that possible again with out any connection trouble ?
I’d want to know your thoughts all along these lines here too, about using a 160 ovpn file instead of 256 in the router and keep the 256 encryption on the PC’s Vypr clients side. As well anything you’d throw out. Maybe a slight detailed view on priority to how things get done in the router and OS with two VPN clients running the traffic encrypted.
Ex: Flow >< cable modem to router(160) and to my PC(256).
Where should the strongest encryption be used – for someones speed that's capped (crappy) as mine ? Or not as having a good Internets speed.
I'll get the router flashed in some weeks but, till then – what's the most practical set up with the tests results I get ?
Thank you Sven ; )
Mullvad is the only one that passed the cure53 and Assured AB tests. Even privacytools.io has kicked most VPNs out because they mostly don’t keep what they promised. Mullvad is the exception here, only this one is recommended because it meets all the criteria. At privacytools.io only 3 VPN`s are recommended:
1st Mullvad
2ND IVPN
3rd ProtonVPN
all the others have failed the tests there and are no longer recommended.
Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Hi Gerhard, the topic of this guide is “No Logs VPN Services”. We are not dealing with general security audits, but rather audits that were done to verify the “no logs” claims.
In terms of security audits, yes, these VPNs have undergone and passed security audits:
ExpressVPN (audit performed by Cure53)
Mullvad (audit performed by Cure53)
TunnelBear – The first VPN that underwent a security audit, with annual updates (also performed by Cure53)
So yes, this is a separate topic from this guide, i.e. VPNs that have undergone security audits.
Regarding the people at PrivacytoolsIO, I’ll just say that they have undergone some major changes and have become very opinionated lately. They were recommending the same VPNs I recommend just a few months ago. Proof:
http://archive.is/I7ynn
Proton VPN started uploading user crash data without permission and no way to opt out months ago. How do they define “crash?” I used them for two years, they started out good but became slow and sneaky. They hold your free email account hostage if your VPN subscription expires, since the VPN renews automatically. No way to get out of that without opening a support ticket and they determine your reason for leaving is good enough. But your locked email account can just be closed and all your info, email and VPN is deleted, a disconnect with their silly email ransom policy. They don’t encrypt email subjects; email is full of spam; good for throw addresses, about all. Proton sites are shiny and impressive; their services, not so much.
Routine (annual?) audits from brand name auditing firms should become the new expected standard of trust in the VPN industry. The only problem is they are expensive, so smaller VPNs may not be able afford them. But that may also be a good thing to weed out shady pop-up VPNs. There’s already way too many small, unproven VPNs on the market.
Maybe what the industry really needs is a major, trustworthy non-profit organization (EFF or EPIC are the only two who may fit the bill) to develop its own auditing and certification standards for privacy services in general, not just VPNs. In order to maintain the hypothetical certification, companies must pass an annual audit and maintain strict standards. This sort of thing already exists in other industries, like in the United States in order to use the USDA Organic seal products have to undergo third-party certification. Though I am absolutely not suggesting a government entity administer the seal; it needs to be a non-profit like EFF.
The only issue with another certification board is that they too can be corrupted. Then the favored VPN will be monopolized.
In theory, it sounds good but as I have seen, bad government comes from too much government.
I believe the best way is to continue educating the general public. Help them to spot false or dangerous VPN’S. Maybe even do a crowd funding if need be, but more red tape is hardly ever the answer.
Just my thoughts.
Hey Brian
Till the infrastructures in place to raise certification and audit standards all across the online industries that deal with public security-privacy, we see the below started for VPN’s.
They (all vpns) should give $0.05 of every subscription dollar trying to get the process a set level cost for all members under their industry banner.
Call for VPN’s to be openly transparent – https://cdt.org/vpns/
CDT convened a discussion at RightsCon in Toronto this spring where IVPN, Mullvad, TunnelBear, and VyprVPN agreed that their industry faces a trust deficit. Coming out of this face-to-face meeting, we have worked with these companies along with ExpressVPN to develop a list of questions that signal basic commitments VPNs can make to signal their trustworthiness and positive reputation.
Cryptostorm.is claims not only to have no logs, but they _actually_ _committed_ “privacy seppuku” (a.k.a “organization death before dishonour”) a couple of years ago when govt. tried to coerce them to cooperate.
They have free as well as paid access with optional tracking filters and port forwarding, also they offer Wireguard in addition to OpenVPN-based clients (that may help with Android battery drain).
Many of their code is published on github, and staff is usually available via web/irc gateway on site (unless they’re sleeping, that is). Sven, could You please take a look at them and maybe review their service?
Howdy Anonymous,
Please see – https://restoreprivacy.com/vpn/best/#comment-48767
Hello Sven,
what’s your opinion on using a VPN (with no logging) to access private stuff like e-mails etc.? As in, would you keep the VPN connected 24/7 for anything you do online? Or is it better to log into private accounts without using a VPN?
Hello Frank, I recommend using a VPN at all times. With ISPs spying on people and recording your activities, why give them any data?
I also alternate between different VPNs and VPN servers for different services and if something is getting blocked by a specific website.
HI Sven,
great article
Regarding no log VPN, even though a lot of VPN providers claim no log, they use third party DNS servers oversea such as provided by Google Inc. Therefore, although VPN providers themselves don’t log, whatever users do have been logged by Google’s DNS servers. Only VPN providers own their won DNS servers can avoid this. I found that one can can check who their DNS servers are by [https://am.i.mullvad.net/]
i am myself is a user of mullvad VPN. I hope you can also do a review on mullvad
No reputable VPN is using Google DNS. All of the VPNs in this article and the one’s recommended on this site use their own DNS, which encrypt all DNS requests in the VPN tunnel.
Have you considered review Surfshark? I’m considering order that because my Freedome licence has been expired.
Yep, I’ll get to it here soon.
Hi Sven:
Thank you for all the work you’ve done on VPNs. I use your website as one of the few sources that I trust on the internet in regards to my web security, and have been very happy with the way you evaluate VPNs. Because of your website, I’ve used Perfect-Privacy, VPN.AC and ZorroVPN. However, when I tried out VPNArea for its wide server functions, good price and Adblock, I was very disappointed as the Adblock function did not work, the systems were clunky and the chat told me the Adblock could not work on “100% of all ads” (when in fact, it worked on 0% of all ads). To their credit, the refund was processed quickly.
I’m now using iVPN which you’ve mentioned in this review. I had serious hesitations about it since it is located in Gibraltar, but they have gone through a full audit in regards to logging by Cure53 like you stated. That alone would not be enough to convince me, but their Safety and Security guides are extensive and take into account people’s threat models, as well as talk about threat models extensively for beginners and how to sanitise one’s online identity. They also refer to your blog in some of the posts on the iVPN account. I am really looking forward to a review from you about iVPN if you can make time on your busy review list, especially since they are hiring Cure53 for a full service audit. Having used Perfect-Privacy, I would really compare iVPN to them (with the added advantage of actually having an app).
ProtonVPN has the same security as the Protonmail. I suggest you could add ProtonVPN as verified no logs stored, they do not store information about connections or website the users visit
https://protonvpn.com/support/no-logs-vpn/
They put effort into Privacy and security through secure core servers
https://protonvpn.com/support/secure-core-vpn/
This guide is only listing no logs VPNs that have been verified and proven, which is not the case with ProtonVPN.
I just stopped using Perfect Privacy. Too often recently the connection would cut out or I would not be able to connect to a particular server(s) on the server list (I’m in Germany and could never connect with Frankfurt and only rarely with Erfurt). Also, not being able to access Netflix and other IP dependent streaming services – such as ITV – is a bummer (especially for watching the rugby world cup).
Gonna try ExpressVPN for a few months to see what they’re like.
Dear Sven,
what about VPNArea? It’s another VPN with a no-log policy (no connection AND no activity logs).
Correct, but VPNArea’s logging policies have not been verified or proven, like the VPNs in this guide.
Hi Sven,
How does the verified and proven system work with any known or unknown VPN Virtual Server Locations ?
https://restoreprivacy.com/virtual-server-locations/
Specifically, say when the VPN service leases out (some) servers from a server complex.
The VPN can verify as audited and tested (as the four above) of it’s hands on operations side but, how’s it go for the server complex (in audits of the leased servers), that the VPN service uses, and in any logs anywhere along the way they may retain on that servers complex side ?
Is that (leased virtual server location) the gray area to heed of audited and tested VPNs ?
Should it have a strong importance factor to the VPNs truthfulness ?
Then if- “the traditional and most common way of running servers relies very much on hard drives, which retain all data until they are erased and written over, a painstaking and error-prone process. This increases the risk that servers could inadvertently contain sensitive user information. If someone were to hack or seize the server, they could gain access to this data.” Though supposedly encrypted, what parts remain in clear texts being it’s connected to a server complex and their own servers complex logging done ?
I would think that a Big concern based on any leased Virtual Server or not locations where there’s none operated in RAM-disk mode.
Thank you and best in the roaring 2020
“The problem, however, is that many VPNs simply use “no logs” as a marketing slogan, but then carefully disclose data that is being recorded in their privacy policy. (An example of this is with Windscribe.)”
That is a bit misleading. This is not the case, Windscribe specifically states there are NO identifiable logs which are then 100% true. The only logs kept that are not identifiable are within server memory cache which gets deleted as soon as you close the VPN connection. That is like saying ExpressVPN keeps logs because they log your email, payment, ETC at signup and purchase of the VPN when that is not what people are asking. They want to know if they are torrenting an illegal file will they be caught? The answer is no for Windscribe and or any of the other services in this list.
That comment was based on previous versions of the Windscribe website which deceptively claimed “We delete everything” and then explained how certain data is logged and recorded in the privacy policy. After I published the first Windscribe review showing that, they changed their website to be honest about their logging policies. Nonetheless, since they fixed it, I have removed the reference to Windscribe in this article.
Hi Sven,
You make it a very fair field in keeping the RP site updated !
That’s what I try to stress at times – your a very busy person with a family and another full time job – BESIDES running this site!
– Other sites compared to yours – leave it after posting, even thought things might be an 360 to the posted info at present of a said company.
–
Wished there was a ‘Wishy-Washy’ and/or ‘Flip-Flop’ part to you RP site in keeping track of just the ‘so called’ Privacy respecting companies/services, who then otherwise are not so forthcoming on their own to this information.
– Learning and growing to a company/business has no purpose of good well – if mistakes and bad directions aren’t apparent in it’s history of said existence.
.
So a place here within your site for a person to know – “approach with caution ! or steer clear of”, where it’s a listed index of all bad actors in that they lay claims to your PRIVACY and then don’t respect it or deliver on it.
– – Happy first day of Fall, when’s the snow going to fall.
I JUST LEARNED THAT AVAST IS NOW OFFERING A VPN WITH PACKAGED WITH THEIR VIRUS SOFTWARE.
ANY INFO ON THE AVAST VPN YET?
FROM HOW I READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY, ITS SO FULL OF LEGAL MUMBO-JUMBO MY INITIAL FEELING IS A RESOUNDING NO, BUT YOUR EXPERT OPINION APPRECIATED.
Avast doesn’t have a good track record with privacy. They’ve been called out for data collection and sharing with their free antivirus in the past.
Hi Sven,
Do you plan on reviewing Windscribe and Ivacy? Also, besides VPN no logging policies, there is much to be said about jurisdictions i.e 5 eyes, etc. In other words, it seems that although a VPN claims no logging, dependent upon where they are domiciled, the VPN might be forced to divulge user info anyway, so it is claimed by many other review sites. For example, Windscribe is based in Canada, a 5 eyes participant, whereas Ivacy is based in Singapore but Snowden revealed that they are secret partners in the Alliance. The question now is whether jurisdiction makes more of a difference in VPN selection in addition to no logging. Windscribe and Ivacy go to great lengths to talk about transparency, and no logging but what is the point of purchasing them based on where they are located? I naively bought both but I am starting to have regrets the more I think about jurisdictions despite no logs. Maybe my thoughts are unfounded? As you see, all this talk about VPN jurisdictions becomes an issue in the selection, and useage process.
Hi Marc, I’m working on a Windscribe review update right now, and Ivacy maybe later.
Thanks Sven. Looking forward to the reviews. I hope you also address the notion of where a VPN is domiciled as a help or hindrance to a true no logs policy alone.
I discuss that issue more here:
https://restoreprivacy.com/5-eyes-9-eyes-14-eyes/
Thanks for a great informative article.
Sven you speak highly of Vypr and their switch to a no logs policy verified by audit but you do not discuss how they or any of the other verified VPNs, handle Torrents or DMCA notices. VyprVPN was notorious for strict enforcement of no Torrenting and DMCA notices by suspending or canceling customer accounts. You can’t talk about no logging without talking about the other policies. Thanks.
Hi Marc, I generally discuss torrenting policies/procedures in the respective VPN reviews. Speaking of VyprVPN, I have an entire section in the VyprVPN review dedicated to their “New torrenting policy and procedures”. Yes, they previously closed accounts over DMCA notices, so I questioned their staff after the no-logs transition. Long story short, with their new policies, they do not take any action on DMCA notices (because they don’t have the logs to do anything anyway). See the VyprVPN review for the direct quotes I got from their staff when clarifying this topic.
Thanks Sven for the clarification. You are right, many other review sites still dwell on the older Vypr policies so you can understand how it becomes questionable until now.
What about ProXpn
vpn.ac is safe and no log ? Thanks a lot.
VPN.ac does have basic connection logs (no activity or browsing data). These are erased daily and they explain why they have them on their website.
Hi Sven, I am confused on your position with IP Vanish. One on hand you recommend them highly in your review, but you mention them here and how the public’s trust has been eroded with them and Pure VPN.
Can you please clarify and update your review of IP Vanish accordingly?
Hi Pantesa, thank you for the reminder. It was never “highly recommended” but I did not the good performance and test results. Anyhow, I just now updated that review to clarify (not recommended) in the conclusion at the bottom. The IPVanish review already included a discussion of the FBI logging case – so nothing changed there. On the whole, IPVanish performed pretty well, but the logging case and US jurisdiction prevent me from recommending it.
Hi and thanks for another great guide. Mullvad VPN also passed an audit from Cure53 and Assured, but it’s not in the list. I hope Sven will review Mullvad so that we’ll know how good it performs. Mullvad has no discounts, special offers or other ‘affiliated programs’, so it’s not much advertised. They sell at 5€/month -period-. It’s open source and has great support for linux.
Thanks for the tip. I’m hoping to get more VPN reviews done in the coming months, but it’s very time consuming, just keeping old reviews updated.
Hey Sven do you have any experience with IVPN? They are being recommended in several sites but I read they have a very limited amount of servers (like about 50 – even though they are quite established in the industry) and charge a premium price for this. Thanks.
Looks like a decent service, but I haven’t tested it yet.
I’ve used PIA, NordVPN and ProtonVPN. In terms of speed from Europe, I’d have to say that ProtonVPN is the fastest. They still have Russian servers, but it’s probably best to avoid those.
Could you give us your opinion about Proton?
Sure: ProtonVPN review
Hi Sven,
First, I like many others greatly appreciate your websites service to privacy and security.
Q; Is there any way a ‘no logs’ VPN provider could collect and sell user information (from subscription info users provide when paying for the service), to ad’s companies (or other), in the same way some ISP’s and DNS server’s do?
Thanks,
madlogic54.
Yes, technically, that’s why trust is so important when selecting a VPN.
A lot of times you’ll see VPN ads when you are using a VPN and one reason for this is because some of the VPN’s IP addresses have likely been identified as IPs belonging to a VPN, and therefore the ad network AI feeds in VPN ads.
How are Panama’s privacy laws compared to the EU jurisdiction? Better than US privacy laws?
Panama is a solid jurisdiction. Regarding the EU, certain countries are better than others, see this guide.
Hi, what do you think of Fsecure-Freedome vpn, not a big number of servers( but more than ivpn for example ), good speed, and despite of some logs and no torrenting, finnish laws are between the best of the world for privacy! Do you believe Fsecure-Freedome is a good alternative to best known vpn companies for privacy seekers, almost for surf deepweb?
Hi Matti, I have not taken a close look at it yet, but I hope to later this year, time permitting.
Hi Sven, i am trying for 3 days IVPN based in Gibraltar, is not very fast i have to say but is very affordable about privacy and security, at least i believe. Do you know something more about IVPN?
I search privacy first of all, security and some torrenting and i think to avoid most of well known vpn with all their advertisements…
Thanks
Walter
Hi Walter, I have not tested IVPN, but it looks like a decent provider, with some comparable features to Perfect Privacy.
Hotspot Shield, Betternet, Hexatech, TouchVpn, Privacy Wizard. Those six are all Vpn soution of AnchorFree Inc. a german society. Anybody know something more about the society and about reliability and privacy of the six Vpn mentioned above?
Thanks everybody.
Steven
AnchorFree Inc I would steer clear of. They have a poor history compared to their competitors & it’s been claimed that they agreed to comply with Russian demands to access data after their recent laws were passed.
Others like ExpressVPN, NordVPN…pulled out of Russia after receiving the letters from the Russian telecoms regulator.
Curiously, ProtonVPN is still there & “claims” it hasn’t received the letter, but is working with a reliable partner & will withdraw if they get a letter, demanding access.
What about Kaspersky Vpn solutions? I believe they are safe and secure, about privacy maybe not but Russia is not part of 14 eyes. If i use this vpn for torrent and eventually for a legal surfing in deepweb i think to be relatively safe.
Thanks in advance to all people who will share their opinions.
Steven
Minor details needs correction, Kaspersky’s infrastructure moved from Russia to Switzerland (which is also out of 14 eyes) after the Russia controversy.
Steer clear.
https://www.vpncompare.co.uk/kaspersky-vpn-russian-censorship/
I am a bit paranoid about torrenting, but I need to download a few movies from Pirate Bay. Are you saying that VPNs make it much harder for ISP to see that I am the one downloading torrents? I think I could afford to get NordVPN, as it’s not that expensive. Their no logs policy sounds legit and also you said that speed in Europe with this provider is pretty good. Would it be the best choice?
Hi Jhon, yes that is correct. When you are connected to a VPN, your internet provider cannot see anything you do. This is because the VPN creates a strong, encrypted connection between your computer and the VPN server, thereby anonymizing your activities. Every website you visit will see the IP address of the VPN server you are connected to, rather than your real IP address. Also, in parts of Europe, media companies and copyright attorneys monitor torrenting swarms and collect connection data to prosecute copyright infringement (this is big in Germany right now). A VPN will protect you from this and hide your IP address when torrenting. Yes, NordVPN is a good choice for this, see their torrenting page here.
What about SecurityKiss Vpn? They seem to be out of 14 eyes and have a good policy of no log, only i dont know them well yet, no much news about them on the internet.
Anybody knows something more? They could be a good choice like expressvpn or perfectprivacy for example?
Thanks
Looks to be a free VPN service. I would avoid.
I would like to buy VyprVpn plus but when i started the payment by card it opened a window
“Golden Frog USA”….but if this is a swiss-based society is almost strange! Or it is a shadow society swiss-based but usa-owned (NSA, FBI, Etc.)?
Good point, Jens. Although Golden Frog is legally based in Switzerland, they use a US payment processor and also have operations staff in Austin, Texas. You can see this on their website under “About”.
Sven,
1) Did you also look at IVPN? Any opinions? They claim no logs and they seem transparent. I couldn’t find many reviews and the Information I could find was outdated (before 2017). Seems like they are not main stream.
2) Did you test PIA or NordVPN in Europe? I’ve heard PIA has some issues with the speeds on the European servers. And frankly the reviews and opinions I’ve read so far for both VPNs are going from “best ever” to “worst ever”
I tested NordVPN servers in Europe and found speeds to be pretty good (see NordVPN review). I need to do a complete PIA review update and re-test everything as the information is dated. I have not tested/reviewed IVPN, but I did discuss them a bit in the WireGuard article because they are promoting their WireGuard support.
I use PIA and Nord in Europe and get faster speeds with PIA!
The ExpressVPN story has other sources than a media ? Any official paper from court or police ?
ExpressVPN provided an official response on their website.
What is your opinion on IVACY VPN?
It is just a rebranded version of PureVPN, running on PureVPN’s infrastructure. Due to many issues with PureVPN, I would not use it or Ivacy.
Hi,
Great article. Also the multihop article was very informative. What about ZenMate? They claim not to log. Any experiences with them? They are Germany based I think.
Zenmate was recently acquired by the Israeli company “Kape”, which is a rebranded version of “Crossrider” – a company that is known to produce sketchy malware that collects data, according to various sources on line (discussed in the Cyberghost review). Zenmate has also been called out for different data leaks over the past year.
Ironically all of these 5 providers use Google Analytics on their web pages.
They might be no log VPNs, but their real policy is:
“We don’t log anything, only our partners do…”
Could you please re-evaluate ProtonVPN .. because many of facts that you have mentioned in your report about it has been changed.
I am using it over 9 months ago and The desktop version is now about 1.6.3 and many changes happen.
we are really waiting for assessment if have time for that.
Regards
If you’re that interested in seeing an updated review by Sven…if I was you, I’d make a donation & then announce publicly you’ve made it, to pay for Sven’s time.
How long do you think it takes to review a provider, a few hours at least I’d say considering they’re infrequent & I bet there’s costs involved too.
As far as I see, while I’m sure the affiliate links pay Sven some money, I bet it isn’t much, I bet much of this site comes out of his own pocket & he does this as he’s an enthusiast, rather than a start-up business he expects to make 6-figures per annum.
I wouldn’t consider it a bad thing Sven to do a fund-raiser every 4-6 months, even if people gave $/£/Euro 5.00, I imagine that’d help considering you’ve a fairly large number of readers.
That’s correct, Richard. Thank you for the suggestions. I do plan on adding more donation options soon, as well as more content and new updates, in the hopes the site can continue to grow.
FYI, the ProtonVPN review has been updated/revised with new test results.
Kick the tires and light the fires, problem oflcaiilfy solved!
Off topic, just FYI: I’ve found that using multi-hop (x3) using Perfect-Privacy VPN allows me to connect to Netflix.
That’s interesting. I was under the impression Perfect Privacy did not work with Netflix.
Sven,
I’ve always wondered how any no-logs VPN providers prevent abuse (smtp spammers, site scrapers, etc) of their service? For that matter, how would they provide tech support (ie; troubleshoot a user’s problems) without connection logs?
Also,
RE: “I have yet to see any VPN offer to undergo an audit of their logging claims, which is a very good sign for NordVPN users.”
I believe TunnelBear also had an external party performing auditing and publish results, though that was before they got bought by McAfee and turned to shit. Then again, it’s not like they were all that great even before the takeover.
Hi Matti, the abuse issue is a tricky one. I’ve seen some providers, such as PIA, block most email services through their VPN. When Perfect Privacy was getting their IPs blocked due to some bad users abusing the service (spamming emails), they just had to purchase and add new IP addresses.
Regarding that quote about audits, good point. I just updated that sentence.
OVPN works well for me
Hi Sven,
Not related to the topic on hand, but I didn’t see an option to post a comment in your “Best VPN” blog.
I have tried many VPNs now and I have had very poor performance with all of them. At first, I thought it was entirely the VPN provider, but even after trying the expensive ones, I have no success. I then tried running speed tests with my iPhone. The speeds doubled, still not great when my non VPN speeds are over 180 Mbps.
I’ve done the usual, disabled my Windows and third party firewall and malware application. I have tried different VPN protocols with no improvement. My CPU usage isn’t high so that can’t be the reason why I have poor speeds.
Therefore, I’m wondering if Windows 7 x64 might be the bottleneck? I’d appreciate your thoughts since I am really frustrated and stumped by my situation.
Thanks
Hi Amber, I would not recommend disabling the Windows firewall. If you are using a third-party antivirus, such as Avast or similar, that may be causing issues with the VPN. I don’t think this is an issue with Windows 7 OS to be honest. Regarding speeds, there are so many factors, it’s difficult to pinpoint. If you are getting 100+ Mbps with nearby servers, that is pretty good for VPN standards. The best you can do is use nearby servers with good bandwidth.
Not all VPN clients are created equally.
I’ve found it’s often necessary to manually create a VPN connection through your Windows Control Panel should you have constant speed issues.
The caveat here is this method doesn’t include a VPN “kill switch” for which you’ll need a third party application like VPN Lifeguard. Additionally, your packets are typically fragmented using the native Windows VPN client.
So what antivirus would you recommend, also a free one, but one that doesn’t conflict with VPNs?
And which one between Nord VPN and Private Internet Access, as they are similar in price per month? I don’t mind 3 years, but I’ll take the cheapest if it’s not a real difference.
BTW, I didn’t enjoyed an article in a long time like I enjoyed yours. Great site overall. Thanks!
Emsisoft is a well-regarded antivirus and it also respects user privacy (unlike most antivirus programs). NordVPN offers more features and it is in a better privacy jurisdiction (Panama), whereas PIA may be slightly faster, but it is really basic and based in the United States, which is a bad privacy jurisdiction.